I have an idea. Hear me out.
You know how we have all these large sectors of the economy that depend on Federal subsidies and/or price supports… like farming, nuclear energy, petroleum exploration, education, basic research… business ventures that will never be profitable…. Know what I mean? There are activities on which we all depend… like farming, or certain energy production methods… but which are not viable or sensible for any prudent business, no matter how large, to pursue. In the past, Federal subsidies have been paid out either as price support for an activity with too low a market value, and too high an expense to justify engaging in it (farming), and to support the use of services which are needed but priced way out of reach for the target market (healthcare, education, aging, housing and so on).
Here’s what I think we should do:
Make a list of everybody that currently gets any kind of subsidy. Of those, you separate them out, based on whether the recipient of the subsidy is the supplier (a business) or the end-consumer ( a poor, old or unfortunate individual). You take all recipients of the supplier subsidies, and you send them each a letter. The letter would say something like this:
Dear leech:
As you know, The economy is in rough shape, and the fact that the Federal Government is paying billions of dollars in subsidies to operations like yours is not helping. Here’s what we’re going to do to remedy the situation:
- Effective immediately, your subsidy payments will stop.
- If, at any time, you cannot operate the activity without gouging your consumers (i.e. raising prices no more that the annual rate of inflation), or if the activity fails (or more accurately, you fail at it), the Federal Government will nationalize the activity and operate it as a public utility.
Thank you for your cooperation,
Uncle Sam
Oh… and to make sure all the utilities can operate as cheaply as possible, you’d need to have a cheap labor pool…. Oh, how would you do that?!…. Oh, I know… The US Military’s been underpaying its people since the dawn of time, and they can’t quit. Wow! What an idea! So, here’s what you do… You make it mandatory that before the age of 27 all physically and mentally able people must have satisfied a 6-year NESO (National Education and Service Obligation)… some people would call it a draft or conscription, but it’s not that at all…
You see, education is another one of those areas that sees a lot of subsidies. More than a little of that money goes to things that do nothing to educate the students, but go a long way toward elevating the prestige of the school and its staff. So instead of subsidizing these schools, you send them the same letter you sent the farmers and the nuclear power plant operators. If any of them become non-viable without subsidies, the government nationalizes them, and suddenly you have a nationally accredited national university system. What you do this these universities, though, is you compress the learning schedule, weed out all the time and attention wasting junk like sports, fraternities, shopping, drinking, TV, having a job, raping each other and so on. The only focus is learning the material. That’s the student’s JOB, and it’s obligated by law under the new NESO plan. Here’s how it works:
You have two obligations, totaling six years, and to be completed by the age of 27.
- You must get an education. At a minimum, you must get an AS in something viable for employment (sorry, basket-weaving and rock stacking don’t count). You are not obligated to use the National University System, but it is available, free of charge.
- You must serve your country. Not necessarily in the military, you could serve in the Peace Corps, or with a number of government agencies, like the Department of Interior, or NOAA, or FEMA. The NESO plan would also have arrangements with organizations like Habitat for Humanity and Doctors Without Borders. The pay would only be a stipend, like in the military, but they would feed, clothe and house you, like in the military.
- The ratio of time spent in service versus education is variable, based on the member’s intentions (which must be established at enrollment), however, each individual must complete a 6-year obligation, including no less that two years service and two years of education. The order is also variable based on the member’s plan
- If you’ve started but have not completed the second phase of your obligation by your 27th birthday, you stay until it’s completed. If you haven’t at least started phase 2 by your 27th birthday, there’s a nice bed for you in Leavenworth, KS.
Why on Earth would the American people support such a whacked-out program as this? Well, yes, it would cost money, but if the operations of these formerly subsidized activities can be made to break even, or better still be profitable under government control, and with a low-paid work force, then that’s saving taxpayer money, isn’t it?
By making college-level education and national service mandatory for all sound-minded, able-bodied people, we help to advance the country, because, if there’s one thing that someone can pick up in the military (and similar experiences), it’s discipline. Discipline is not about marching straight or saying “SIR, YES SIR!”, it’s about 2 things: 1) Knowing what needs doing, and doing it, and 2) Remaining calm, observant and responsive. There’s not enough of that kind of discipline in this country. The population is growing more ignorant, irrational and chaotic with each passing day. The generations currently in the workforce and on the voting rolls are already lost (me among them), in terms of being helped by a program like this, but the ones coming up behind us could be helped immeasurably. Austria, Mexico, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Israel, Malaysia, the Republic of China (Taiwan), Russia, Singapore, South Korea, Norway, Sweden, and Switzerland all have compulsory military service. We could make military service just one option on a menu of civil and (secular) charitable directions in which a member could satisfy his or her obligation to serve. Park rangers are needed, border patrol agents, air traffic controllers… you name it… in fields like these, the service side of the obligation could be like a paid internship… a foot in the door they would not otherwise have gotten.
Another thing a program like this would do for the country… it would tend to break the cycle of poverty, because it would gently but firmly remove people from an unfavorable situation, give them an education and a job, as well as a chance to see life from a perspective other than “the streets” (y’know, where Vanilla Ice grew up). Even if the education doesn’t stick and they hate the job, at least it gets them out of the routine of shootings, rapes and drug deals long enough that they might see another way to conduct their lives.
Certainly, not everyone can be saved by a program like this, but I think it would serve the country (and the people) in several important ways:
- Use Federal money (your money) to advance the lot of the poorest among us, rather than lining the pockets of people whose pockets are already thoroughly lined
- Reduce the corruption of the Federal Government by reducing the routes by which Representatives and Senators become beholden to special interests. If you can’t operate your farm at break-even point without Federal subsidies, then why are you in the middle? We’ll pull you out of the mix, put a bunch of college-educated kids in there, earning half what you are, and get the job done.
- Reduce crime and poverty. I’m convinced that one of the biggest factors perpetuating poverty in this country is that the upper and middle classes have given up on the poor, and have taken to looking out for themselves (however well-off they might be). If you can take people out of the poverty feedback loop (and isolate them from it), give them a marketable skill, the ability to socialize, a respectable work ethic, and a decent job, when they’re done, they stand a better chance of carrying on in that vein, than falling back into their old ways.
- Reduce the Federal budget deficit (and maybe… just maybe… pay down the frickin’ debt). Subsidies are pork. No two ways about it. Subsidies prop up businesses which are inherently not profitable. Rather than propping up executives, prop up the poor and give THEM a chance to be executives. Vertically integrate the process, and run it as efficiently as possible, but ensuring the real ends are served.
- Serve the real purpose of government. The big difference between running a business and running a government is that a business has to be profitable, at any and all costs, while the government is charged with “form[ing] a more perfect Union, establish[ing] Justice, ensur[ing] domestic Tranquility, provid[ing] for the common defense, promot[ing] the general welfare and secur[ing] the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity” at any and all costs. The goal is not for the government to make a profit, itself, but to make the lives of its people — ALL its people — as just, tranquil, secure and blessed with liberty as possible. The nation as a whole profits, and that’s the point.
- Others I just don’t have time to write. If you don’t get the point by now, you’re probably voting McCain-Palin, and for all the wrong reasons.
I dunno… I mean there’s lots of details that need to be worked out (and I’m neither a sociologist nor a business man… hell, I never graduated from college. There are certainly people out there with the skills, experience, and education to make this work and get the kinks out)… this would be a massive venture… probably on the scale of the Manhattan Project or landing Neil Armstrong (and Buzz Aldrin) on the moon… but it is a peaceful endeavor, it means no harm to anyone, it gives everybody a fair shake to do something positive with their lives, and, best of all, it puts this country (the government AND the people) on a path to reduced corruption and fiscal responsibility.
What do you think?